<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corruption, extortion uncovered at DMOZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickifaulk.com/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickifaulk.com/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/</link>
	<description>I am: a web designer, geek, gamer and aspiring super mom. This is my portfolio and sandbox in this digital playground called The Internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:54:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classified</title>
		<link>http://www.nickifaulk.com/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/comment-page-1/#comment-19057</link>
		<dc:creator>Classified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nitallica.org/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/#comment-19057</guid>
		<description>I do not evan think people use DMOZ any more.  Most links are way out dated or go to click it type pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not evan think people use DMOZ any more.  Most links are way out dated or go to click it type pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric-the-Bun</title>
		<link>http://www.nickifaulk.com/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/comment-page-1/#comment-18407</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric-the-Bun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nitallica.org/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/#comment-18407</guid>
		<description>From Shoemakers disclaimer which he says everyone should read before acting on the post:-

&#039;You should assume everything written on this blog is a lie. You should assume I have motivation for linking to everything on this page and will benefit from it somehow. .... You should question everything. You should come up with your own thoughts and opinions and not trust some stupid blogger.&#039;

Looks like there are a lot of stupid bloggers out here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Shoemakers disclaimer which he says everyone should read before acting on the post:-</p>
<p>&#8216;You should assume everything written on this blog is a lie. You should assume I have motivation for linking to everything on this page and will benefit from it somehow. &#8230;. You should question everything. You should come up with your own thoughts and opinions and not trust some stupid blogger.&#8217;</p>
<p>Looks like there are a lot of stupid bloggers out here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Whittaker</title>
		<link>http://www.nickifaulk.com/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/comment-page-1/#comment-18394</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Whittaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nitallica.org/2007/08/28/corruption-extortion-uncovered-at-dmoz/#comment-18394</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t believe everything you read...

That blog post is dated 26th August 2007. The &quot;last updated&quot; date on the category in question (http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Web_Design_and_Development/Authoring/Webmaster_Resources/Affiliate_Programs/Weblogs/) is currently &quot;April 12, 2007&quot;. So any site that isn&#039;t currently showing there, was removed on or before 1th April.

Whether or not he actually received those emails, the timing of things doesn&#039;t really match up.

Perhaps more importantly, assuming that http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=150377 is by the same person, that bribery offer would be enough to earn the site in question a permanent ban -- which could well explain why the site was actually de-listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t believe everything you read&#8230;</p>
<p>That blog post is dated 26th August 2007. The &#8220;last updated&#8221; date on the category in question (<a href="http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Web_Design_and_Development/Authoring/Webmaster_Resources/Affiliate_Programs/Weblogs/">http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Web_Design_and_Development/Authoring/Webmaster_Resources/Affiliate_Programs/Weblogs/</a>) is currently &#8220;April 12, 2007&#8243;. So any site that isn&#8217;t currently showing there, was removed on or before 1th April.</p>
<p>Whether or not he actually received those emails, the timing of things doesn&#8217;t really match up.</p>
<p>Perhaps more importantly, assuming that <a href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=150377">http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=150377</a> is by the same person, that bribery offer would be enough to earn the site in question a permanent ban &#8212; which could well explain why the site was actually de-listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

